Historically, hybrid tribunals have been set up in various ways, key elements of their composition being:
1) Trial chambers (one or several) and appellate chamber.
2) Judges: international, local or both.
3) Possible introduction of investigative judges.
4) Prosecution: international, local or both.
5) Registry: registry of domestic courts and/or registry specifically created for the hybrid tribunal.
6) Defence: no special provision or defence office established within the Registry.
7) Funding: contributions from the UN and/or other States and/or State budget.
8) Management/Oversight: various mechanisms.
9) Applicable Law: existing domestic law and/or special regulation for the tribunal.
See Appendix I: comparative table of seven hybrid tribunals (key features other than jurisdiction)
**Regulation 64 panels in the Courts of Kosovo (Regulation 64 Panels); Special Panels for Serious Crimes in East Timor (SPSC); Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL); Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC); War Crimes Chamber in the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina (WCC); Iraqi High Tribunal (IHT); Special Tribunal for Lebanon (LST).Borrowed from: Sarah Williams, Hybrid and Internationalized Criminal Tribunals: Jurisdictional Issues. A doctoral thesis submitted to durham university in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree doctor of philosophy (law). March 2009. (visited on Jan. 13, 2024).